Kursus tutvustab üliõpilastele olulisemaid tehnoloogiaga seotud küsimusi üle maailma, pannes erilist rõhku EL põhimõtetele. Samuti õpetatakse rakendama põhimõtteid ja norme, mis reguleerivad mingi konkreetse tehnoloogiavaldkonna õiguslikke suhteid.

This course aims to introduce students to the core issues of technology regulation all over the world, with a particular focus on European Union frameworks, as well as teaching to apply the main principles and norms in regulating the usage of a specific technology.

Aine läbinud üliõpilane:
- leiab ja selgitab tehnoloogiaõiguse peamisi põhimõtteid ning takistusi;
- rakendab üldiseid teadmisi õigusest tehnoloogiaga seotud hüpoteetilistes kaasustes.

After the successful completion of the course, the student:
- identifies and explains the main legal principles and obstacles in technology law;
- applies general knowledge of law to solve a hypothetical case of technology regulation.

Kursusel käsitletavad teemad hõlmavad informatsioonitehnoloogia, biotehnoloogia, kübertehnoloogia, neurotehnoloogia, tuumatehnoloogia ja robootika õiguslikku reguleerimist. Samuti pöörab kursus suurt rõhku olemasolevate regulatsioonide riskidele ja kasule, muu hulgas siseriiklkud ja rahvusvahelised põhimõtted, soft law, delegeeritud seadusandlus, sisemised reeglid ja standardid, trahvid ja ergutusvahendid.

The topics cover a broad overview of regulating information technologies, biotechnology, cyber technology, nanotechnology, neuro-technology, nuclear technology and robotics. The course is also focused on assessing the risks and benefits of the existing regulatory approaches, including national and international legal frameworks, soft law, delegated legislation, internal rules and standards, fines and incentives.

Lõpphinne kujuneb eraldi osade koondina.

The final grade is formed as a set of separate parts.

vastavalt laiendatud ainekavale

according to the extended syllabus

Guihot, M. (2019). Coherence in technology law. Law, Innovation and Technology, 11(2), 311-342.
Brownsword, R., 2015. In the year 2061: from law to technological management. Law, Innovation and Technology, 7(1), pp.1-51.
Jørgensen, R.F. and Desai, T., 2017. Right to Privacy Meets Online Platforms: Exploring Privacy Complaints against Facebook and Google. Nordic Journal of Human Rights, 35(2), pp.106-126.
CCPA vs. GDPR comparison chart, access mode: https://resources.workable.com/hr-terms/ccpa-vs-gdpr
Roberts, H., Cowls, J., Morley, J., Taddeo, M., Wang, V. and Floridi, L., 2019. The Chinese Approach to Artificial Intelligence: an Analysis of Policy and Regulation. Available at SSRN 3469784.
Müller, V.C., 2017. Legal vs. ethical obligations–a comment on the EPSRC’s principles for robotics. Connection Science, 29(2), pp.137-141.
Schellekens, M., 2018. No-fault compensation schemes for self-driving vehicles. Law, Innovation and Technology, 10(2), pp.314-333
Tsachi Keren-Paz, Tina Cockburn & Alicia El Haj (2019) Regulating innovative treatments: information, risk allocation and redress, Law, Innovation and Technology, 11:1, 1-16
Montgomery, J., 2019. The ‘tragedy’ of Charlie Gard: a case study for regulation of innovation?. Law, Innovation and Technology, 11(1), pp.155-174.

-